CTG and fetal monitoring

CTG monitoring and birth injury claims

A guide for families worried that fetal monitoring in labour was not interpreted or acted on properly.

Clinical negligence analysis

Clear answers,
grounded in evidence.

Quick answers

This page explains how CTG and fetal monitoring issues may be assessed in birth injury claims. It is general information only.

Why fetal monitoring matters

Fetal monitoring is used to assess the wellbeing of the baby during labour. NICE guidance emphasises hourly assessment, documentation, consideration of risk factors and escalation when fetal compromise is suspected.

Potential failures

Potential claims may involve failure to use continuous CTG when indicated, misinterpretation of the trace, failure to recognise deterioration, delay in senior review, delay in stopping oxytocin, or delay in expediting birth where required.

The whole clinical picture

An abnormal trace alone does not decide a claim. The proper legal analysis considers maternal observations, contractions, labour progress, meconium, sepsis, oxytocin, antenatal risk factors and changes over time.

Causation

The key question is whether competent interpretation and escalation would probably have led to earlier delivery and whether that earlier birth would probably have avoided or reduced hypoxic injury.

Evidence needed

Important evidence includes CTG traces, maternity notes, partogram, obstetric and midwifery notes, decision-to-delivery times, cord gases, neonatal observations, imaging and expert evidence.

Sources used

This page is informed by NICE fetal monitoring in labour guidance and NICE cerebral palsy guidance. See NICE: Fetal monitoring in labour and Cerebral palsy in under 25s.

A confidential first step

Speak to Scott about a potential instruction

If the article raises issues similar to your circumstances, Scott and his team can consider whether the matter merits initial assessment.

Speak to Scott Or call 0203 835 4964